Skip to content
FREE POSTAGE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD when you spend over $50USD/£35 Use the button at the top of the page to choose your local currency. We ship from our warehouses in the USA, UK (EU with IOSS), and Australia!
FREE POSTAGE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD when you spend over $50USD/£35 Use the button at the bottom of the page to choose your local currency. We ship from our warehouses in the USA, UK (EU with IOSS), and Australia!

Country

Russian Infantry

SKU WAAGW004
Original price $34.95 - Original price $349.00
Original price $104.00
$34.95
$34.95 -
Current price $34.95

Multi-Buy Deals! Want to Build a BIG Army? We have you covered! Use the pull down menu aabove to choose your deal:

Buy 3 Boxes for $95/£70

Buy 5 Boxes for $145/£105

Buy 10 Boxes for $265/£190

FOR THE FAITH, THE TSAR, AND THE MOTHERLAND!

Russia entered World War One with the largest army in the world - 1.4 million under arms! Despite these vast numbers the Russians fared poorly against Germany and Austria-Hungary after initial successes. As the war dragged on, unrest in home led first to the February Revolution in early 1917 seeing the downfall of the Tsar. Russia was soon embroiled in a civil war that would culminate with the formation of the Soviet Union.

This hard plastic set allows you to build up to 35 Russian infantry equipped for World War One and suitable for the Russian Revolution and beyond. A selection of hat and helmet types allow you to model a variety of troop types including officers, Reds, Whites, and gas masked troops. Moisin Nagant rifles, officer pistols and sabres, and grenades give you a wide range of weaponry to choose from.

There are five frames in each box

Models require assembly and painting. Bases are not included. Items may not exactly match the photos.

  • Sculpting: Gia Huy
  • Illustration: Peter Dennis
  • Figure Painting: Jason Frowde (Painting Knights) and Martin Oaff and Chris Hindmarsh
  • Research: Wayne Peter Bollands

Customer Reviews

Based on 9 reviews
56%
(5)
22%
(2)
11%
(1)
0%
(0)
11%
(1)
K
Khayman Bliss
Great kit, but a few minor issues

Even though there aren't really any other options for 28mm WW1 Russians, this kit is extremely well-detailed, dynamic, and is a great value for the price. These guys look phenomenal when you get them done, and they're detailed without being too busy, which means they paint up to tabletop standard very quickly.

That said, there are some issues with the build and the sprues. For one, the kit does not come with instructions, and not all the arm options fit properly on all the torso options. The kneeling figure in particular can fit maybe two of the nine cross-torso arm sets without liberal use of sprue goo or greenstuff, so expect to use the "pointing arm" and pistol arm on this guy a lot.

The sprues themselves certainly have some... choices. Unlike the other kits in this line, you can't really use this box to make specialists, as you get no machineguns or carbines, and your options outside of Mosin-Nagants on each sprue are limited to a single Arisaka, a C96 Mauser (with no real space on the arm to attach the holster-stock), a Nagant 1895 revolver, two officer's sabres (one sheathed, one wielded), and a single arm holding a grenade. As such, the kit is great for line infantry, but you'll have to look at other options or kitbash with the other kits in this line to make specialist. Even making unarmed models for conscript fireteams is a bit difficult, as there are only two sets of left and right arms on each sprue that can be assembled without weapons, and they can look a bit awkward if not properly combined.

The head options are an odd choice as well. The peaked caps are great, both the open-faced and gas-masked ones, and add a lot of character to the kit. The kit also comes with Budenovka hats for making RCW Red Russians, which is at least somewhat interesting; and a full suite of open-faced and gas-masked Adrian helmets, which is an oddball choice considering these were barely used by the Russian army in WW1 at all. This is great for anyone who wants to recreate one of a handful of battles in 1916, but I would have preferred that the space on this sprue for helmets be given over to more specialist options or trench weapons instead.

Once you finally get the hang of putting these guys together (the first sprue is definitely the hardest), they're actually pretty fun and relaxing to assemble, and they look good painted up without too much extra effort. I definitely recommend them, though with the caveat that they may be a bit overwhelming for an entry-level hobbyist and that you'll probably have to track down some other options to fill out your army properly.

D
DG
Great kit

Love the variety of heads!

A
Alessandro Coia
Great kit!

Detailed kit with loads of options, perfect for kitbashing!

T
Tyler Oliver
Russian box

Wargames atlantic is fantastic.

M
Mikhail Lebkov
Good idea with careless realisation

I was looking forward to this set to make these for Russo-Japanese war. I was ready for some further work to make these looking appropriate for that conflict. However, I was disappointed by this set.

The kit on figures looks good and appropriate, as do the torsos, and face features and overall quality of the heads seems good. Even if, in my opinion, the Red Army head options were unnecessary, because the difference in uniform was too huge to cover both RCW armies in one set, the quality of Budenovka hats is pretty good.

However, when it comes to hand options, nearly half of them looks strange and inappropriate. They are handling guns in wrong angles, their wrists are twisted in unrealistic ways. This makes most poses looking poor without serious rework.

Furthermore, the weapons' proportions are poor even for the 28mm scale, and also I was disappointed with the Arisaka rifle option - the bolt handle and other parts of the rifle are orientated in wrong direction. The reason is that the Arisaka rifle hand was just mirrored one from the forthcoming Japanese set. Such issues make it clear that the preparation of this kit was made with less care than I would expect.

Overall this set is not bad in my opinion, but some important and careless mistakes forse me to try to find more appropriate alternatives.